Is the World 'Health' Organization Guilty of the Social Murder of the Unborn?

A quick look at the plunge in births in the Philippines and the USA in 2020-21 shows that it is likely there are millions of missing babies across the world.

If the policies enacted by the World Health Organization, and governments, in the name of public health have resulted in the loss of millions of children being born, is that social murder?

One of the largely overlooked impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic policies is that the birth rates have plunged dramatically, and this has likely resulted in millions of children not being born.

The draconian lockdowns, the never ending interruption to the normal functioning of society, the disruption to peoples jobs and businesses, and the associated impoverishment of hundreds of millions of people, if not a billion or more, has resulted in a massive drop in the birthrates. In uncertain, or bad economic times, people have fewer children.

The harsh Covid-19 pandemic policies have been foisted on the world through the International Health Regulations agreement, or IHR, which the World Health Organization signed 194 nations to in 2007, and it is the key legal instrument that has put the WHO in control of the global responses to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Every single Covid-19 policy that has harmed society, harmed public health, and devastated the global economy was mandated by the World Health Organization through this legal mechanism.

It may be that China did it all first, the lockdowns, the PCR testing, the social distancing, the temperature checks, border closures, facemasks and handwashing, mandated vaccines, and vaccine passports, but it was the global public health institution that codified it into plans, like this one on the 3.2.20, and instructed nations across the globe to follow these policies.

The policy responses to the Covid-19 pandemic are what have created the most harm and destruction, not the virus. And one of the silent unseen disasters is the dramatic decline in the birth rates. Children that would have been born, following the historical trends, have not been born.

Millions of missing children.

As yet I have not seen any estimations done of the worldwide loss of children by the unprecedented drop in the birth rates, but we can look to the Philippines and the United States as examples that illustrates that there are likely many millions of missing children.

In this chart, produced by an expat living in the Philippines, we see that in 2020 there was a large drop in the average daily registered births resulting in fewer births in 2020 compared to 2019. And in 2021 there was an even steeper drop. According to this chart there were 465,141 fewer children born in the Philippines from the beginning of 2020 through to September 2021.

While I have not been able to confirm that the figures calculated on this chart above are accurate, this article in the New York Times tells us that the U.S. birthrate declined 4% in 2020. A demographer at the University of New Hampshire, Kenneth Johnson, said “The birthrate is the lowest its ever been.” And in December 2020, the Brookings Institute estimated that there would be between 300-500,000 fewer births in the United States in 2021 due to the economic downturn during the pandemic.

From the richest countries, like the United States, to the poorest countries, like the Philippines, the birthrates have plunged dramatically in 2020 to 2021.

How many millions of children have not been born due to the devastation of society, public health, and the global economy by the draconian policies for Covid-19 forced on the world in the name of public health by the World Health Organization?

Are the Covid-19 policies social murder?

If the Covid-19 public health policies enacted by the WHO and the global elites have resulted in the loss of millions of lives of the unborn, is this social murder?

Let’s look at the definition found in Wikepedia:

Social murder (German: sozialer Mord) is a phrase used by Friedrich Engels in his 1845 work The Condition of the Working-Class in England whereby "the class which at present holds social and political control" (i.e. the bourgeoisie) "places hundreds of proletarians in such a position that they inevitably meet a too early and an unnatural death".[1] This was in a different category to murder and manslaughter committed by individuals against one another, as social murder explicitly was committed by the political and social elite against the poorest in society.[1]

Friedrich Engels maintained that when the elites in control created conditions that caused the common man to ‘meet a too early and an unnatural death’ that this was indeed a form of murder, and he termed it social murder.

But I think that the definition of ‘social murder’ needs to be updated as society has changed enormously from the class based social structure of 1845. Let’s redefine the term to make it more modern. I propose the following:

SOCIAL MURDER 2.0: If any elites, be they institutional, political, commercial, or other groups in society, create negative or detrimental effects on the lives, the health, and the livelihoods of other members of society, especially those with less social, political and economic power, such that it results in creating an earlier, or an unnatural death, then this is in effect social murder.

If the Covid-19 policies of the World Health Organization, and the political elites in governments that put those policies into effect, have resulted in earlier or unnatural deaths, then can that be considered social murder?

And if these policies have created an unprecedented plunge in the world’s birth rates resulting in a loss of millions of children being born, does that fall under the same definition?

Is the World Health Organization guilty of the social murder of the unborn?

What do you think?