Man-Made Climate Change is a Hoax
September 21st 2023
Source: Getty Images
Everywhere we look today we see what I believe is a colossal and gross misallocation of capital and human resources, which is dedicated to the climate change policies that have been generated by the 2015 Paris Agreement, which is an international treaty on climate change.
This agreement is the source of all climate change policies, and it is the source of the obsessions with decarbonization, the attacks of the use of fossil fuels, the Net Zero policies, the policies of removing nitrogen fertilizer from farming, the deliberate reduction in using fossil fuels like coal to create cheap electricity, the attacks on red meat, and numerous other policies which can only be described as insanity, because they are collectively an attack on the standards of living of the majority of humanity, and are already leading to the impoverishment of countless millions.
The ugly, inconvenient, and evil truth is that all of these policies, and the entire basis of the Paris Agreement, are based on the hoax that climate change is man made, and that carbon dioxide, which is the source of all life, is a dangerous gas, and that man-made carbon dioxide is the source of all climate change. It is all utterly ridiculous, and it is extremely easy to prove.
I will state categorically that I believe this is a hoax because the United Nations, and its partners, insist it is an undeniable conclusion, but the simple and self-evident scientific truths show this is demonstrably false. It begs the question what is the real agenda of the United Nations, but that is beyond the scope of this article.
2015 Paris Agreement
If you have never heard of the Paris Agreement I would not be surprised, because it was never discussed at the level of nations, it was never discussed with the citizens, and it was never voted on by the citizens of each nation, so it has no mandate at all from 99% of humanity. The United Nations tells us:
The Paris Agreement is a legally binding international treaty on climate change. It was adopted by 196 Parties at the UN Climate Change Conference (COP21) in Paris, France, on 12 December 2015. It entered into force on 4 November 2016.
The Paris Agreement was agreed on by government representatives of 196 nations, without any consultation or mandates from their citizens. Instead it is being forced down from the top of the world, down through the totalitarianism of the 1% using the global institutions, the multinationals that make up the World Economic Forum, the G20 with its corrupt national leaders, and the international banking and finance sector. The banking and finance industry is forcing these policies through the Net Zero Banking Alliance which adheres to the policies created by the World Economic Forum’s ESGs, or Environmental and Social Governance policies, which are also being forced down through the multinational corporations that are members of the World Economic Forum, which dominate almost every industry on earth.
According to Wikepidia the goals of the climate change convention are as follows.
The Paris Agreement's long-term temperature goal is to keep the rise in mean global temperature to well below 2 °C (3.6 °F) above pre-industrial levels, and preferably limit the increase to 1.5 °C (2.7 °F), recognizing that this would substantially reduce the effects of climate change. Emissions should be reduced as soon as possible and reach net zero by the middle of the 21st century.[3] To stay below 1.5 °C of global warming, emissions need to be cut by roughly 50% by 2030. This is an aggregate of each country's nationally determined contributions.[4]
This statement makes a gigantic assumption, and I call it an assumption because there is no scientific proof anywhere that it is correct. All of the climate change conventions have been developed are based on climate change models created by the United Nations. Mathematical models, like the ones used to lockdown the world for Covid-19, which were proven 100% inaccurate. There is no data, no hard facts, and no real science that support these assumptions. They are based on mathematical models, which is why the United Nations likes to say that it owns The Science™. But in this article we will see that the entire climate change industry is predicated on an enormous hoax, which is quite easy to prove.
Net Zero: The Paris Agreement Assumption
The assumption of the Paris Agreement is that man made emissions of greenhouse gases, or GHG, and in particular carbon dioxide, are responsible for warming the planet, and that an increase in temperatures is creating ‘global warming,’ and that this leads to man-made climate change.
The United Nations claims that the solution is to cut man-made emissions, especially carbon dioxide, and to reach Net Zero by 2050, the middle of the 21st century. The Wikepedia page on Net Zero informs us that:
Global net zero emissions, or simply net zero, is a state in which human-caused emissions are balanced by human-caused carbon dioxide removals over a specified time period.[2] In some contexts, "emissions" refers to emissions of all greenhouse gases, and in other contexts it refers only to emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2).[2]
Achieving net zero targets requires actions to reduce emissions, such as by shifting from fossil fuel energy to sustainable energy sources. To counterbalance their residual emissions, organizations commonly offset them by buying carbon credits. The terms net zero emissions, carbon neutrality, and climate neutrality are often used interchangeably.
So, the Paris Agreement seeks to measure all the ways that mankind creates carbon dioxide emissions, and seeks to cancel those emissions, or to neutralize them all so that we reach this imaginary balance called Net Zero.
Man-Made Climate Change
It is vitally important to understand that when the phrase ‘climate change’ is used the real meaning, though almost never stated this way in the media, is ‘man-made climate change,’ which refers to the claim made by the United Nations that climate change is man-made.
In debating this issue it is important to use the full statement. Because if we only talk about ‘climate change’ then there is a double meaning here that is a trap.
Everyone knows that the climate is always changing. It has been changing for millions and millions of years, and it will go on changing for millions of years to come. The fact that climate changes is indisputable. There are numerous factors that affect climate change, but here’s two that are rarely discussed.
As the sun shines on the earth 24 hours a day 7 days a week, I would argue that it gives our planet a never ending growth in energy receipts to the earth that is providing the basis for constant growth in life and change on earth. Apart from the sun, our earth’s core is molten and is unimaginably hot, as we see when volcanoes erupt, and so the core itself is creating constant changes and fluxes in the heat of the earth, which must also affect our environment in ways we can only guess at.
When people oppose the United Nations policies and claims of man made climate change calling it a hoax, then the supporters of the U.N.’s position will often lash out at these people and say that they are ‘climate change deniers.’ This is rubbish, and it is nasty rhetoric aimed at silencing the critics of the man-made climate change hoax. When people deny the United Nations claims about climate change they are denying the claim that climate change is man made and caused by mankind’s emissions, especially carbon dioxide. There are 3 important points that we may consider to show that the claims about man-made climate change are a hoax.
1. Carbon Dioxide is the Source of All Life
Carbon dioxide is the source of all life and an absolutely essential gas to the process of creating food from plants, and oxygen for all life that depends on it, and this is done through the process called photosynthesis, which most people learned about in school.
Photosynthesis uses carbon dioxide as a vital component, and is the process by which plants convert sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide into oxygen and carbohydrates, which becomes the leaves, stems, roots, and woody trunks. And after plants die, they decay, releasing the carbon back to the atmosphere.
Through photosynthesis, plants also release oxygen into the atmosphere, which is essential for the respiration of all humans, animals, fungi, and even plants use it too. In turn, humans and animals exhale carbon dioxide, which is then used by plants for photosynthesis, which creates a virtuous cycle of interdependence.
Carbon dioxide to put it very simply is plant food. Plants suck in carbon dioxide and store the carbon as plant fibers through the process of photosynthesis using sunlight. It is really a rather miraculous process as the energy of the sun, which shines 24/7 on our earth, radiating a non-stop stream of energy to the planet, which is then converted into plants, which stores carbon, and creates food for all animals and human beings on earth. Carbon dioxide is plant food, that creates food and oxygen for most other life forms on our planet.
The more carbon dioxide there is in the atmosphere the more the plants grow, the more food there is for all, and the more oxygen there is. So in fact we should be adding carbon dioxide to the atmosphere not reducing it. And we should be increasing the plants and green cover as well. Conversely if you reduce the carbon dioxide then there is less food and less oxygen to support human and animal life, which threatens the health, well being, and existence of all life.
From this simple point we can see that carbon dioxide is not the dangerous gas as the United Nations, its partners, and the mainstream media insist on claiming that it is. In fact carbon dioxide is plant food, supports the growth of all food, and provides oxygen for all life. Carbon dioxide is a vital, important, and essential ingredient to life.
2. The CO2 % in the Atmospere
What would you say if you were asked the question: What percentage of the earth’s atmosphere is carbon dioxide? The vast majority of people cannot answer this question accurately, worse they are usually off by a factor of hundreds of times.
I ask this question often when discussing the man-made climate change hoax as it illustrates the very real mass ignorance that is supporting the agenda of the United Nations and its partners. And considering that every single day we hear about climate change endlessly in the media, then this is clearly something that is not being discussed and communicated to the public.
Wikepedia, or any scientific source for that matter, tells us that “Carbon dioxide is a trace gas in Earth's atmosphere at 421 parts per million (ppm), or 0.0421%.”
If you were unaware of this before, then yes, you read that right. 0.0421%. This is 421 parts per million. Which means that 99.96% is not carbon dioxide. 99% of the atmosphere is made up of oxygen at 21%, and nitrogen at 78%. All other gases, including carbon dioxide are trace gases found in tiny, tiny, tiny quantities.
3. Man-made CO2 vs. Nature
Broadly speaking there are 2 types of carbon dioxide sources on planet earth. One source is mankind, which means all of the activities that we as human beings particpate in that create carbon dioxide emissions. This includes our cars, our airplanes, our ships, our houses, our industries, our farming, and fossil fuel power stations, to name a few. And remember it is the claim of the United Nations that it is these man-made carbon dioxide souces that are the cause of climate change.
The second source is the natural world itself. There are many natural sources of carbon dioxide emissions. For example, decomposing plants, wildfires, volcanos, lakes and dams, outgassing from the oceans, fungi, and all animals.
Considering that carbon dioxide is 0.0421% of the atmosphere, what would you say if you were asked the question: What % of the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is created by mankind, and what percentage is created by nature? Again the majority will answer this question incorrectly.
The actual percentage of the total carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that is created by mankind is 3%, yes just three percent. The natural world produces 97% of all carbon dioxide, which is 32 times greater than mankind’s emissions. More importantly as a percentage of the total atmosphere the carbon dioxide created by mankind is just 3% of 0.0421%, which is 0.00126%, or 12.6 parts per million. Mankind’s carbon dioxide emissions as a percentage of the atmosphere are virtually zero.
What is amazing is that the United Nations, and its partners, claim that the 97% of the carbon dioxide created by nature is not responsible for the alleged global warming and the alleged temperature rises, but that it is the 3% created by mankind.
To put this in perspective. The United Nations informs us that the pre-industrial levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was 288 parts per million, and today it is about 421 parts per million, a difference of 133 parts per million. But if mankind only produces 3% of the carbon dioxide, which is just 12.6 parts per million, then the increase in carbon dioxide is more likely coming from the natural world and not from mankind.
CO2: The Deforestation Effect
While I was writing the last paragraph it occurred to me that the increase in carbon dioxide is more likely to be the effect of deforestation as opposed to the burning of fossil fuels, which do make up the majority of the carbon dioxide emissions of mankind.
Credit: Robert A. Rohde (original PNG), User: Jklamo (SVG conversion) [CC BY-SA 3.0(link is external)
Since the Industrial Revolution, (1740 to 1840), which marked the beginning of the rise of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the demand for firewood, charcoal, and timber, along with the exponential rise in urbanization, which continues to this day, and a demand for great swathes of industrial farmland, altogether led to widespread deforestation.
Our World in Data tells us that:
Shortly after the end of the last great ice age – 10,000 years ago – 57% of the world’s habitable land was covered by forest. In the millennia since then a growing demand for agricultural land means we’ve lost one-third of global forests – an area twice the size of the United States. Half of this loss occurred in the last century alone.
So we have removed one third of the planet’s forests, most of it since the Industrial Revolution. But forests are the greatest biological machine for removing carbon dioxide, and half of this loss has occurred in the last century.
This means that if 30% of the forest capacity for removing carbon dioxide has been removed then there will be a corresponding minimum 30% rise in the percentage of carbon dioxide from the natural emissions that stays in the atmosphere. And this will compound and grow exponentially, especially as the rate of deforestation also has ramped up exponentially.
If we take the pre-industrial age figure for carbon dioxide of 288 parts per million, this means that there could be an increase of one third which is the missing forests, or 96 parts per million, making for a total of 384 parts per million. But today there is 421 parts per million, of which 3% or 12.6 parts per million come from mankind on an annual basis. So, the difference betwen 384 and 421 is 37 parts per million, which we might attribute cumultively to mankind since the Industrial Revolution, but the majority of the increase is coming from nature.
The deforestation affect is much more likely to be the explanation for the increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, and not the 3% that is contributed by mankind today, which is virtually zero by comparison to nature.
If the issue of green cover is not addressed, then no matter what mankind does to reach the alleged solution of Net Zero, the increase from the natural world will continue, and nothing we do will make any difference to the levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. It will continue to rise.
This would suggest that the solution is not to reduce what mankind is doing in terms of burning fossil fuels, which come from the carbon sink within the earth, and is adding carbon back above the earth into the interdependent cycle of life, but we must focus on increasing the forests and green space on the earth again, which will soak up this additional carbon. This would of course provide more food and oxygen for all life forms, including humans.
Probably the best example of such a green policy is Singapore, which has a “garden city” vision, introduced by then Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew in 1967, and it transformed Singapore into one of the greenest cities in the world.
Singpore’s land now has almost 47% of green cover, and it is a much more livable city with abundant lush greenery, a much cleaner environment, and makes life much more pleasant for the cities residents and visitors. Singapore points the way to true environmental solutions.
Credit: efired / Adobe Stock
Statistics & Climate Claims
A Google search on the question - ‘Where does the majority of CO2 come from?’ produced this statement:
Fossil fuel combustion (burning) for energy accounted for 73% of total GHG emissions and for 92% of total U.S. anthropogenic CO2 emissions in the United States. CO2 emissions from other anthropogenic sources and activities were about 6% of total GHG emissions and 8% of total CO2 emissions.
Firstly, the Google search has failed to state the obvious truth, which is that the majority of all CO2 emissions, 97%, comes from the natural world and not mankind.
It is worth noting that Google recently signed an agreement with the United Nations for ‘verfied climate change information’ which I believe is code for spreading the disinformation of the United Nations and opposing all information that counters the claims of the U.N. It is Big Brother censorship on a global scale.
When we read statements like this it creates the impression that the activities of mankind are responsible for all of the carbon dioxide emissions, especially the burning of fossil fuels for electricity production. But the truth is that these percentages represpent the percentage of mankinds emissions of carbon dioxide, which make up only 3% of the total in the atmosphere, so all of these percentages are vastly smaller when stated as a percentage of the total. For example:
Fossil fuel burning in the United States makes up 92% of the 3% of the carbon dioxide created by Americans in the atmosphere, which is 0.0276% of the total CO2 in their atmopshere.
By making bold statements about the percentages of different human activities that produce carbon dioxide emissions, which are expressed as a percentage of the total of mankind’s emissions, instead of as a percentage of the total in the atmosphere, then the statistical numbers used are alarming, and incredibly deceptive. They are a great tool for fear mongering.
We must conclude that this deception is deliberate because the people who make these statements cannot not know the real numbers. They are using statistical deceptions to alarm the public.
Conclusions
The most important facts that illustrate the claim that climate change is a man-made phenonomen is at best an unsupported conclusion, but at worst an actual hoax being perpetrated on humanity by the United Nations and its partners are as follows.
Carbon dioxide is the source of all life. Through photosynthesis plants store carbon, and create food for all animals and all humanity, and create oxygen which supports almost all life on earth.
Carbon dioxide is only 0.0421% of the earth’s atmosphere, which is 421 parts per million.
Of the carbon dioxide content of the atmosphere mankind’s emissions only account for 3%, whereas nature accounts for 97%, which is 32 times more.
Reducing the carbon dioxide levels reduces plant life, which will reduce food and oxygen for all animals and humans. It effectively reduces the ability to sustain life on the planet.
Climate change is a natural occurring phenonomen, and there is no scientific evidence it is caused by mankind.
Since the Industrial revolution started the world has lost most of the 30% of the total lost forest cover, which is much more likely to be the true cause of increasing levels of carbon dioxide, most of which comes from nature.
Statistics are being misused to alarm the public.
The United Nations Science™ relies on mathematical models, consensus amongst their community, guesswork, and the censorship and vilification of anyone that disagrees. This is not science.
The real question about the climate change issue is: What is the real agenda of the United Nations and its partners? We can see that trillions of dollars have been diverted to this agenda, and that today the majority of corporate, private, and public monies are focused on the climate change policies coming from the Paris Agreement. Indeed it has become a multi-trillion dollar industry, and benefits the winners in numerous ways, while the majority of humanity are the losers, which is a subject for future articles.
I believe the focus on (man-made) climate change is one of the greatest misallocations of capital and human resources in history. It is based on a lot of disinformation that is repeated by the general public as dogma. The claim that man-made climate change is real. The claim that carbon dioxide from man-made emissions is the guilty party, and that carbon dioxide is dangerous. The claim that we must decarbonize, and stop using fossil fuels, and reach Net Zero by 2050.
It is all dogma. Repeated endlessly.
We can safely conclude that the United Nations claim that climate change is man-made and is coming from our carbon dioxide emissions is a hoax.
Further Reading: The CO2 Coalition
A really great resource for climate facts is the CO2 Coalition, which is a non-profit foundation of scientists who are alarmed at the United Nations policies on climate change and the negative impacts of decarbonization. Their stated purpose is:
The CO2 Coalition was established in 2015 as a 501(c)(3) for the purpose of educating thought leaders, policy makers, and the public about the important contribution made by carbon dioxide to our lives and the economy. The Coalition seeks to engage in an informed and dispassionate discussion of climate change, humans’ role in the climate system, the limitations of climate models, and the consequences of mandated reductions in CO2 emissions.
There are numerous scientists that disagree with the United Nations and its community’s ‘consensus.’ But these people are censored, attacked and vilified. It is remarkable the level of censorship that is happening today, which seeks to cancel all of the scientific voices that disagree with the global institutions agendas, which includes Covid-19 as well as climate change. It is claimed that there is ‘consensus’ but when the scientists that disagree are silenced, cancelled, and censored, this does not represent a consenus at all. It is fascism.
Quite apart from that, consensus is not science. A consensus is the group opinion of a given group. Science is driven by data, facts, and observations. It is not driven by mathematical climate models, opinions, guesswork and consensus. Anyone talking about consensus is really promoting an agenda, not science.
Hi Ivan, great article! The UN agenda on the “climate change” hoax is same as the scamdemic hoax - depopulation, poverty & slavery for the masses.
Great accurate article.
Of course it is a hoax. Much like nuclear winter was also a hoax.
Next they will be saying we need a little nuclear winter to stall the global warming.
Best location for the nuclear explosions will be the sparsely populated plains of America.
Around 450 explosions ought to do it. (This is precise, and it's 450 because we have 400 missiles in the silos, and that way they don't have to know which.)